Cimfepopol'ckaya klinicheckaya bol'nica ckopoy medicinckoy pomoschi № 6
Crimean Federal University of a name of V.I.Vernadsky
Cimfepopol'ckaya klinicheckaya bol'nica ckopoy medicinckoy pomoschi № 6
Peptic ulcer disease is a major health problem due to its potential complications such as bleeding, perforation, penetration, stenosis, malignancy. The most common of these is bleeding, followed by perforation, which is the main indication for emergency surgery and causes most deaths. Penetration into adjacent organs manifests itself with atypical symptoms, which complicates diagnosis. The results of the examination may be distorted, since signs of peritonitis may be minimal. Surgical outcomes in patients with such complications as bleeding, perforation, penetration, stenosis in combinations is rare in literature. Timely diagnosis and treatment require high-quality anamnesis and examination of the patient. Surgical treatment of multiple complications of ulcer in one patient is a complex clinical problem associated with the choice of the method of intervention, the need for an interdisciplinary approach, high risk of decompensation. Based on the presented clinical observation, the authors draw attention to the issues of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of a patient with gastric ulcer complicated by bleeding, stenosis, and ulcer penetration into the hepatoduodenal ligament and head of the pancreas. Emphasizing the diagnostic di–culties associated with a combination of such a number of gastric ulcer complications at the same time, the presentation of this clinical case is aimed at improving the quality of diagnosis and tactics of surgical treatment.
gastric ulcer, bleeding, perforation, penetration, pyloric stenosis, hemorrhagic shock, pancreatitis, pneumothorax, hydrothorax, pyelonephritis.
1. Vakil N. Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2024;332:1832-1842. doi:10.1001/ jama.2024.19094
2. Lau J. Y., Sung J., Hill C., Henderson C., Howden C. W., Metz D. C. Systematic Review of the Epidemiology of Complicated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Incidence, Recurrence, Risk Factors and Mortality. Digestion. 2011;84:102-113.
3. Søreide K., Thorsen K., Harrison E. M., Bingener J., Møller M. H., Ohene-Yeboah M., Søreide J. A. Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386:12881298. doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00276-7
4. Dadfar A., Edna T.-H. Epidemiology of Perforating Peptic Ulcer: A Population-Based Retrospective Study over 40 Years. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020;26:5302-5313. doi:10.3748/ wjg.v26.i35.5302
5. Tarasconi A., Coccolini F., Biffl W. L., Tomasoni M., Ansaloni L., Picetti E., Molfino S., Shelat V., Cimbanassi S., Weber D. G., Abu-Zidan F. M., Campanile F. C., Di Saverio S., Baiocchi G. L., Casella C., D Kelly M., W
6. Shepet'ko E. N. Oshibki, opasnosti i oslozhneniya v hirurgii oslozhnennyh gastroduodenal'nyh yazv. K.: Feniks; 2019.
7. Yuan Y., Leontiadis G. I. Editorial: ulcer-related vs non-ulcer-nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding-which has worse outcomes? Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2019;49(6):818–819. doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15144
8. Quah G. S., Eslick G. D., Cox M. R. Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2018;23(3):618625. doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4047-8
9. Giordano A., Prosperi P., Alemanno G., Bergamini C., Bruscino A., Valeri A. G. Diagnostic and therapeutic role of laparoscopy in perforated peptic ulcer in the elderly patients. Il Giornale di Chirurgia. 2020;41(1):40-45.
