Making Deep Maps
Journal: SCIENTIFIC NOTES OF V.I. VERNADSKY CRIMEAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY. PHILOSOPHY. POLITICAL SCIENCE. CULTUROLOGY
Volume 10 № 3
, 2024
Rubrics: CULTUROLOGY
Authors:
1.
Crimean Federal University of a name of V.I.Vernadsky
2.
Crimean Federal University of a name of V.I.Vernadsky
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 79
to 97
Status:
Published
Received:
13.12.2024
Accepted:
16.12.2024
Published:
16.12.2024
Subject area:
UDK 37 Народное образование. Воспитание. Обучение. Организация досуга
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
deep mapping, deep map, deep maps, collective memory, classification of deep maps
Abstract (English):
The article is dedicated to the concept of deep maps and the role of deep maps in the humanities. The author, David J. Bodenhamer, identifies five types of deep maps: archival, descriptive, research, narrative, and immersive. Each type serves its own purpose, from storing and analyzing data to creating an interactive experience for users. Deep maps help explore the interaction between people and the surrounding space by incorporating multiple perspectives, emotional aspects, and elements of memory into the analysis.
The article is dedicated to the concept of deep maps and the role of deep maps in the humanities. The author, David J. Bodenhamer, identifies five types of deep maps: archival, descriptive, research, narrative, and immersive. Each type serves its own purpose, from storing and analyzing data to creating an interactive experience for users. Deep maps help explore the interaction between people and the surrounding space by incorporating multiple perspectives, emotional aspects, and elements of memory into the analysis.
Keywords:
deep mapping, deep map, deep maps, collective memory, classification of deep maps
deep mapping, deep map, deep maps, collective memory, classification of deep maps
1. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch., 2-e izd. t.3. – M., 1955. – 630 s.
2. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch., 2-e izd. t.4. – M., 1955. – 615 s.
3. Lebedev S.A. Filosofiya nauki: Slovar' osnovnyh terminov – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt. 2004. – 316 s.
4. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. – M.: «Progress», 1983. – 605 s.
5. Lazarev F.V., Novoselov M.M. Materialisticheskaya dialektika kak obschaya teoriya razvitiya. – M.: «Nauka», 1982.
