The article analyzes the counterclaim as one of the means of defense of the defendant in the civil process. The article examines the concept of a counterclaim and its effectiveness as a way to protect the rights of the defendant from the original claim. The purpose of filing a counterclaim is highlighted as one of the ways of abuse of procedural rights. The article analyzes the terms of filing a counterclaim under the Agroindustrial Complex of the Russian Federation, the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the positive experience of other countries. The article analyzes the judicial practice with the late filing of a counterclaim and the filing of a counterclaim at the final stage of the trial. The article describes the consequences of the return of counterclaims filed for the purpose of delaying the consideration of the dispute. The analysis shows that there is an urgent need to legally establish a deadline for filing a counterclaim, after which the filing of a counterclaim will not be possible.
court, plaintiff, defendant, judicial protection, claim, counterclaim, institution of counterclaim, civil procedure, substantive claim, trial, return of the statement of claim.
1. Hvalygina N.L.Vstrechnyj isk v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom processah // Vestnik KGU.-2018.- № 3.- S.304-306
2. Kommentarij k Arbitrazhnomu processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / Kommentarij k Arbitrazhnomu processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / A.V. Absalyamov, D.B. Abushenko, A.I. Bessonova i dr.; pod red. V.V. YArkova. 4-e izd., ispr. i pererab. Moskva: Statut, 2020. 1071 s.
3. Osobennosti arbitrazhnogo proizvodstva: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie / pod red. I.V. Reshetnikovoj. Moskva: YUsticiya, 2019. Seriya «Arbitrazh». 324 s.
4. Popov V.V. Vstrechnyj isk: sochetanie processual’nyh principov processual’nyh principov i mezhdunarodnyh norm //Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process.-2005.-№10.-S.36
5. Borodkin V.G., Stan’kevich A.V. O nekotoryh problemah arbitrazhnogo processa i sposobov zashchity prav. Sbornik ocherkov. CHast’ 1.-M.: «Infotropik Media», 2018.- 180s.
6. Arbitrazhnyj processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 08.12.2020) // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012.
7. Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (red. ot red. ot 08.12.2020, s izm. ot 02.03.2021) // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 2002. № 46. St. 4532.
8. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Central’nogo okruga ot 05.04.2017 № F10-863/2017 po delu № A08-5365/2016 [Elektronnyj resurs] - Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://client.consultant.ru/site/list/?id=1011217253 (data obrashcheniya 19.03.2021).
9. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 27.09.2017 goda po delu № A40-55624/17 [Elektronnyj resurs] https://sudact.ru/arbitral/doc/pZ8c9J5Lru1E/ (data obrashcheniya 15.03.2021).
10. Hozyajstvennyj processual’nyj kodeks Ukrainy ot 06.11.1991 № 1798-XII - [Elektronnyj resurs] - Rezhim dostupa: URL https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text (data obrashcheniya 16.03.2021).
11. Boreckaya L.R. Nekotorye aspekty realizacii processual’nyh prav otvetchika v civilisticheskom processe // Krymskie yuridicheskie chteniya. Razvitie konstitucionalizma v Rossii: sb. materialov nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Simferopol’, 10 -11 iyunya 2020 g.). V 2 t. /Pod obshch. red. N.N. Kolyuki; sost. T.L. Kozlov, E.A. Osadchuk. - Simferopol’: OOO «Amirit», 2020 - T. 1 - S.185-189.
