Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article offers an analysis of the doctrinal interpretation and trends in law enforcement practice of determining the form of guilt witch is typical for illegal business without an obligatory license. The article presents the most popular points of views in determining the subjective side of illegal business without a license and trends in law enforcement practice. Also the increased role of judicial interpretation of national legislation is noted. Regrettable there are some contradictory judicial acts still are made despite solved case by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The contradictory judicial practice in criminal cases, which is currently available, creates confusion in law enforcement practice.

Keywords:
illegal business, license, form of guilt
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Eksperty rasskazali ob osnovnyh narusheniyah so storony silovikov. - URL: https://zabiznes.rf/news/news/22 (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

2. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 18 noyabrya 2004 g. № 23 «O sudebnoj praktike po delam o nezakonnom predprinimatel’stve». - URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/1253895/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

3. Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoj deyatel’nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii. Sankt-Peterburg: YUridicheskij centr Press, 2007. 763 s. - URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003186816 (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

4. Sem’yanov E.V. Obzor sudebnoj praktiki «Nezakonnoe predprinimatel’stvo. Osobennosti privlecheniya k otvetstvennosti» // «Arbitrazhnoe pravosudie v Rossii». № 3, mart 2009 g. - URL: https://internet.garant.ru/#/document/5696272/paragraph/22/doclist/3464/showentries/1:0 (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

5. Silaev A.V. Problemy ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe predprinimatel’stvo: po materialam UrFO: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. CHelyab. gos. un-t, 2012. 232 s. - URL: https://viewer.rusneb.ru/ru/000199_000009_004974100?page=158&rotate=0&theme=white (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

6. Kuznecov A.P., Gladyshev YU.A. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossii: otvetstvennost’ za nezakonnoe predprinimatel’stvo. 1999. № 8. S. 39. - URL: http://lawlibrary.ru/article1062320.html (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).

7. Liholetov A.A. Ponyatie i vidy prestuplenij v sfere special’nyh vidov predprinimatel’stva // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2018. № 1 (44) S. 81-87. - URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36288563_23695504.pdf (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

8. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 27.10.2020) - URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

9. Obzor praktiki primeneniya sudami polozhenij glavy 8 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii ob obstoyatel’stvah, isklyuchayushchih prestupnost’ deyaniya (utv. Prezidiumom Verhovnogo Suda RF 22 maya 2019 g.) - URL: http://www.vsrf.ru/documents/practice/?year=2019 (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

10. Prigovor Vol’skogo rajonnogo suda Saratovskaya oblasti ot 11 noyabrya 2019 goda po delu № 1-1-217/2019. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/ACfMm0jwKz6R/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

11. Prigovor CHerkesskogo gorodskogo suda Karachaevo-CHerkesskoj Respubliki ot 11 fevralya 2020 goda po delu № 1-82/2020. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/OrwtiY3rIBZX/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

12. Prigovor Georgievskogo gorodskogo suda Stavropol’skogo kraya ot 19 avgusta 2019 goda po delu № 1-309/2019. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/HTUMKZFxraUR/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

13. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22.03.2012 № 475-O-O. - URL: https://legalacts.ru/doc/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-22032012-n-475-o-o-ob/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

14. Prigovor Kinel’skogo rajonnogo suda Samarskoj oblasti ot 10 marta 2011 g. po delu № 1-46/2011. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/E7WgbkD3Moou/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

15. Kinel’skij rajonnyj sud Samarskoj oblasti, delo № 1-46/2011. - URL: https://kinelsky-sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=sf&srv_num=1&_deloId=1540006&_caseType=0&_new=0 (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

16. Prigovor Oktyabr’skogo rajonnogo suda g. Arhangel’ska Arhangel’skoj oblasti ot 14 oktyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-224/2015. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/14lRDCSkmr60/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

17. Prigovor Presnenskogo rajonnogo suda g. Moskvy ot 2 iyulya 2012 g. po delu № 1-16/2012. - URL: www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/n3RLgLmuWIgn/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

18. CHast’ pervaya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii ot 30 noyabrya 1994 g. № 51-FZ - URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/ (data obrashcheniya 05.08.2021).

Login or Create
* Forgot password?