Russian Federation
This article presents a study of the surviving elements of the cultural landscape and the reconstruction of the disappeared elements of this landscape using the example of the abolished village of Balta-Chokrak in the Crimean Mountains, as well as a demonstration of the possibilities of such an approach to other rural cultural landscapes of Crimea. The authors developed a classification of the degree of preservation of the historical rural cultural landscapes of Crimea, according to which the cultural landscape of the village of Balta-Chokrak is characterized by a low degree of preservation (due to the destruction of the previous planning of residential development as a result of modern economic activity). Despite the above fact, single elements of the relict rural landscape have been preserved on the territory of the former village. Thanks to documentary evidence and a survey of the territory, the researchers were able to determine the location of various elements of the cultural landscape of the village, such as: a water supply source, colonists’ houses, an agricultural district with arable and pasture lands, small wood forest and areas for stone mining, transport infrastructure, religious buildings and necropolis. It is also important that since the necropolis of the village of Balta-Chokrak is one of the few surviving elements of the cultural landscape. Therefore, a complete catalog of his tombstones and their fragments is also presented.
Crimea, Balta-Chokrak, colony, Crimean Tatars, Greeks, historical geography, cultural landscape, church, mosque
1. Bez sroka davnosti: prestupleniya nacistov i ih posobnikov protiv mirnogo naseleniya na okkupirovannoy territorii RSFSR v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny: gorod Sevastopol': sb. arhivnyh dokumentov
2. Selo Balta-Chokrak: 1900–1915 [URL]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://pastvu.com/p/1242723
3. Gorbikov-Kanaki A. Nezabytaya istoriya krymskogo sela // MIR-info. – 23. 03. 2020 [URL]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://mir-info.com/stories/nezabytaja-istorija-krymskogo-sela
4. Gosudarstvennyy arhiv Respubliki Krym (GARK). – F. 26. – Op. 1. – D. 27338. – L. 12.
5. GARK. – F. 118. – Op. 1. – D. 5070. – 130 l.
6. GARK. – F. 142. – Op. 1. – D. 1. – L. 203–237.
7. GARK. – F. 142. - Op. 1. – D. 84. – L. 91–122.
8. GARK. – F. 142. – Op. 1. – D. 134. – L. 134–155.
9. GARK. – F. 142. – Op.1. – D. 260. – L. 186–218.
10. GARK. – F. 142. – Op.1. – D. 319. – L. – 201–232.
11. GARK. – F. 142. – Op. 1. – D. 331. – L. 1–64.
12. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 13. – D.155. – L. 1.
13. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D. 124. – L. 1.
14. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D. 125. – L. 1.
15. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D. 126. – L. 1.
16. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D. 136. – L. 1.
17. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D.142. – L. 1.
18. GARK. – F. 377. – Op.14. – D. 319. – L. 1.
19. GARK. – F. 377. – Op. 14. – D. 325. – L. 1.
20. GARK. – F. 843. – Op. 1. – D. 1. – L. 70–92.
21. Grecheskaya koloniya v krymskom s. Balta-Chokrak i rod Kokinomati // Reportazh M. S. Lazaridi ot 23 avg. 2018 g. na kanale ΕΛΠΙΔΑ+/EL'PIDA+ [URL]. Rezhim dostupa:
22. Kozlov V. F. Nasledie pravoslavnogo Kryma. XVIII – seredina HH v. Monastyri, monastyrskie podvor'ya, hramy, chasovni: nauchno-spravochnoe izdanie. – M.: Institut Naslediya, 2022. – 644 s.
23. Latyshev V. V. Zametki k hristianskim nadpisyam iz Kryma: Novye soobscheniya Bert'e-Delagarda // ZOOID. – T. XXI. – 1898. – S. 225–254.
24. Leybenson Yu. T., Leybenson A. V. Bahchisarayskie hristianskie nekropoli XIX – nachala HH v.: istoriya i problemy sohraneniya // Izuchenie i sohranenie istoricheskih nekropoley: materialy
25. Markevich A. I. Nekropol' Simferopolya. 1. Staroe hristianskoe kladbische v Simferopole // ITUAK. – T. 55. – 1918. – S. 330–375.
26. Marcinovskiy P. N. Proizvodstvo i dobycha stroitel'nyh materialov v Krymu v posledney chetverti XIX – nachale XX veka // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo.
27. Montadon Sh. Putevoditel' puteshestvennika po Krymu, ukrashennyy kartami,planami,vidami i vin'etami i predvarennyy vvedeniem o raznyh sposobah pereezda iz Odessy v Krym.– Kiev:ID «Stilos», 2011. – 416 s.
28. Petrovskaya O. I. Istoriya Svyato-Mitrofanievskoy cerkvi na Al'me // Tavrida Pravoslavnaya. – 2020. – № 7 (497). – S. 8–9.; № 8 (498). – S. 9–11.
29. Ruev V. L. Ekskursii po okrestnostyam Simferopolya: Holodnaya balka, Tash-Dzhargan, Kayalar. – Simferopol', 2023. – 218 s. – (Biblioteka krymovedeniya).
30. Ruev V. L., Leybenson Yu. T. My poseleny mezhdu gor...»: k istorii sela Balta-chokrak v Yugo-Zapadnom Krymu v konce XVIII – HH vv. // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo.
31. Salgir. – 1903. – № 93. – 29 aprelya. – S. 1.
32. Statisticheskiy spravochnik Tavricheskoy gubernii / sost. F. N. Andrievskiy; pod red. M. E. Benenson. – Simferopol', 1915. – Ch. II. – Vyp. 6: Simferopol'skiy uezd. – 186 s.
33. Tavricheskaya guberniya: Spisok naselennyh mest po svedeniyam 1864 g. / Izd. Central'nym Statisticheskim komitetom Ministerstva vnutrennih del. – SPb.: Tip. K. Vul'fa, 1865. – 137 s.
34. Hayredinova E. A. Dobycha i obrabotka kamnya v srednevekovom gorode na plato Eski-Kermen // MAIET. – 2023. – Vyp. 28. – S. 305–322.
35. Cheh S. S. Opyt issledovaniya starogo Simferopol'skogo kladbischa // ITUAK. – T. 55. – 1918. – S. 321–329.
36. Yurochkin V. Yu., Oleynik T. V. Srednevekovyy skal'nyy kompleks v uschel'e Glubokiy Yar v Yugo-Zapadnom Krymu // Vladimirskiy sbornik II: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii 2020. – S. 303–317.
37. Yakovlev A. N. Kolokol'nya // Pravoslavnaya enciklopediya. – M.: CNC «Pravoslavnaya Enciklopediya», 2014. – T. 36. – S. 380-390.
38. Ballance S., Bryer A., Winfield D. Nineteenth-century monuments in the city and vilayet of
39. Jankowski H. A Historical-Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Russian Habitation Names of the Crimea. – Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006. – 1233 p.
40. Yakobson A. L. A propos des relations entre les rygions littorales au Nord et au Sud de la Mer Noire // Bizantinoslavica. – 1981. – T. XLII. – F. 1. – P. 43–51.
41. Czcan Z. Greek Orthodox Churches in Anatolia // Transactions on the Built Environment. – 1997. – Vol. 26. – P. 45–55.
